
| MMM 383 | March 10, 1999 |
The latest agricultural census was recently released by USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). This is based on 1997 survey data and is the most comprehensive study of the South Carolina farming sector; it is completed on a five-year basis. For comparative purposes, 1997, 1992 and 1987, selected data are shown in the following table.
Some of the table data were also calculated/presented in other
forms than the original census statistics. For example, "Farms
by Size" and "Farms by Value of Sales" are reported
as percentages instead of the actual number. Total Value of Land
and Buildings and Market Value of All Machinery/Equipment were
derived by the Average Value Per Farm times the Number of Farms.
The right-most column of the table contains a "c" for
those values that have been calculated.
The typical initial issue is the definition of a farm. A "farm"
is defined as: "any establishment from which $1,000 or more
of agricultural products were sold or would normally be sold during
the year." In the past, there have been differences in the
scope of what is a farm as the Census and NASS differed in what
should be considered as a farm. For example, previous Census considered
Christmas tree production units as farms while NASS did not. This
meant there were some variations in numbers according to source
although the census definition has remained constant. Since this
is the first Agricultural Census that was collected and calculated
by NASS, this definition will be consistent in the future.
Another issue was the state 1992 to 1997 increase of Land in
Farms. This measure is not static and land can move into or out
of this category across time. For example, it does not include
commercial forestry land that was not located on a farm; it also
would not include fallow/other land that was not part of a farm.
Based on the latest census, South Carolina agriculture became
more productive and underwent significant change during this most
recent five-year period. The calculated total value of land/ buildings
and machinery/equipment was near $7.5 bil. as compared to $5.7
bil. in 1992. The market value of all products increased by about
$500 mil. ($1.588 bil. vs. $1.066 bil.) from 1992 to 1997; this
was more than a $20,000 increase per farm. A larger proportion
of this increase came from livestock and products (over 50 percent)
as compared to crops/nursery/greenhouse; most of this growth in
livestock was poultry.
In considering structure, Farms by Size did not change significantly
by the percent within size categories. The 1997 total Number of
Farms was near the same level as 1992 and 1987 while Land in Farms
was larger but Cropland as Percent of Farm Acres declined. The
Average Size of Farm increased from 221 to 228 acres between the
latest two census periods. Farms by Value of Sales were over 40
percent (1997) in the Less than $2,500 grouping as compared to
36 percent in 1992 and 1987. Farms with sales of $100,000 or more
also increased from 10 percent of all farms in 1992 to 11.3 percent
in 1997. There were also more part-time farmers as Operators by
Principal Occupation and Other was over 60 percent in 1997. In
addition, Operators by Days Worked Off Farm also increased for
both the "Any" and "200 Days or More" categories.
There continued to be an increase in female farm operators
as nearly 10 percent of 1997 operators were in this category as
compared to 8 percent in 1992 and less than 7 percent in 1987.
The percent minority farm operators continued to decline over
time (1997, 7.4 percent; 1992, 9.0 percent, 1987, 9.9 percent).
The average age of operator also tended upward and reached 56.3
years in 1997.
Market value of Agricultural Products Sold increased over $500
mil. during the most recent five-year period; this value was over
$1.5 bil. in 1997 while the average per farm was $78,665. The
change in Total Farm Production Expenses more than doubled from
the 1992 to 1997 period as contrasted with the 1987 to 1992 interval.
Total 1997 farm expenses for the state were over $1.2 bil. as
compared to $.897 bil. in 1992 and $.737 bil. in 1987. Net Cash
Returns Agricultural Sales for the Farm Unit were likewise more
than doubled during the latest period -- this per farm value moved
from less than $8,000 in 1992 to over $16,000 in 1997.
South Carolina agriculture has undergone critical changes.
Based on the latest census data, there were several general trends
such as an increase in value of land/buildings and machinery/equipment,
expanded value of sales, larger production expenses, significantly
higher net cash returns, more part-time and larger farmers and
a shift toward poultry/livestock. The number of farms have stabilized
while the average farm size was slightly higher.
|
|
|||||||||
| Item | Unit | 1997 | 1992 | 1987 | |||||
| Farms | number | 20,189 | 20,242 | 20,517 | |||||
| Land in farms | acres | 4,593,452 | 4,472,569 | 4,758,631 | |||||
Average size of farm |
acres | 228 | 221 | 232 | |||||
| Value of land and buildings | 1,000 $ | 6,558,074 | 5,092,543 | 4,127,384 | c | ||||
Average per farm |
dollars | 324,834 | 251,583 | 201,169 | |||||
Average per acre |
dollars | 1,482 | 1,137 | 871 | |||||
| Est. market value of all machinery/equip | 1,000 $ | 902,215 | 669,545 | 641,197 | c | ||||
Average per farm |
dollars | 44,687 | 33,077 | 31,252 | |||||
| Farms by size: | |||||||||
1 to 9 acres |
pct. | 6.1% | 6.4% | 6.5% | c | ||||
10 to 49 acres |
pct. | 28.3% | 27.1% | 26.5% | c | ||||
50 to 179 acres |
pct. | 37.2% | 37.5% | 37.7% | c | ||||
180 to 499 acres |
pct. | 17.9% | 18.3% | 18.3% | c | ||||
500 to 999 acres |
pct. | 6.1% | 6.2% | 6.4% | c | ||||
1,000 acres or more |
pct. | 4.5% | 4.4% | 4.6% | c | ||||
| Total cropland | farms | 17,514 | 18,037 | 18,578 | |||||
| acres | 2,462,818 | 2,588,525 | 2,686,117 | ||||||
Cropland as % farm acres |
pct. | 53.6% | 57.9% | 56.4% | c | ||||
Harvested cropland |
farms | 13,426 | 14,587 | 15,556 | |||||
| acres | 1,654,535 | 1,590,794 | 1,589,636 | ||||||
| Market value of agric. products sold | 1,000 $ | 1,588,173 | 1,066,079 | 878,683 | |||||
Average per farm |
dollars | 78,665 | 52,667 | 42,827 | |||||
| Crops/nursery/greenhouse crops | 1,000 $ | 791,104 | 562,036 | 451,285 | |||||
Percent of all products |
pct. | 49.8% | 52.7% | 51.4% | c | ||||
| Livestock/poultry/products | 1,000 $ | 797,069 | 504,043 | 427,398 | |||||
Percent of all products |
pct. | 50.2% | 47.3% | 48.6% | c | ||||
| Farms by value of sales: | |||||||||
Less than $2,500 |
pct. | 40.4% | 36.3% | 36.2% | c | ||||
$2,500 to $4,999 |
pct. | 15.2% | 16.4% | 17.1% | c | ||||
$5,000 to $9,999 |
pct. | 13.4% | 14.3% | 14.1% | c | ||||
$10,000 to $24,999 |
pct. | 11.3% | 12.0% | 12.4% | c | ||||
$25,000 to $49,999 |
pct. | 5.0% | 6.4% | 6.2% | c | ||||
$50,000 to $99,999 |
pct. | 3.5% | 4.6% | 4.6% | c | ||||
$100,000 or more |
pct. | 11.3% | 10.0% | 9.3% | c | ||||
| Total farm production expenses | 1,000 $ | 1,233,736 | 897,923 | 736,918 | |||||
Average per farm |
dollars | 61,112 | 44,359 | 35,917 | |||||
| Net cash returns ag sales farm unit | 1,000 $ | 328,569 | 157,727 | 123,915 | |||||
Average per farm |
dollars | 16,275 | 7,792 | 6,040 | |||||
| Operators by principal occupation: | |||||||||
Farming |
pct. | 39.4% | 43.8% | 43.7% | c | ||||
Other |
pct. | 60.6% | 56.2% | 56.3% | c | ||||
| Operators by days worked off farm: | |||||||||
Any |
pct. | 57.5% | 55.7% | 57.5% | c | ||||
200 days or more |
pct. | 42.0% | 41.1% | 41.7% | c | ||||
|
Operators by sex: Male |
|
90.1% | 92.0% | 93.3% | c | ||||
| Female |
|
9.9% |
8.0% |
6.7% |
c | ||||
| Operators by race: White |
|
92.6% |
91.0% |
90.1% |
c | ||||
| Black/other race |
|
7.4% |
9.0% |
9.9% |
c | ||||
| Average age of operator | years |
56.3 |
55.5 |
54.5 |
|||||
| Notes: "c" means that value has been calculated from census data. | |||||||||
Management Marketing Memo Index
Ag Econ Home