
| MMM 413 |
August 26, 2002
|
A Preliminary Analysis of Loss in South Carolina Major
Agronomics Crops
Due to Drought in 2002
Todd D. Davis, Hal M. Harris, Charles E. Curtis, and Russ Sutton
South Carolina is experiencing its fifth consecutive drought year. In 2001, even though drought persisted, timely rainfall in major producing areas resulted in excellent crop yields on average. This paper provides a preliminary analysis of the cost of the drought in South Carolina in 2002. This paper only addresses potential primary losses of major agronomic crops. Secondary industry impacts and quality of product impacts are not included.
State Average Yields
Table 1 and Table 2 illustrate the persistent effect of drought on South Carolina crop yields. State average corn yields were below the 10-year average in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2002 (projected). Yield loss was particularly severe in 1998, at 53% of 10-year average, and is projected to be 55% of the 10-year average for 2002 (Table 2).
Table 1. South Carolina State Average Yields for Major Agronomic Crops from 1992-2002.1/
| Year | Corn | Soybeans | Wheat | Cotton | Peanuts | Tobacco |
| Bu./Acre | Bu./Acre | Bu./Acre | Lbs./Acre | Lbs./Acre | Lbs./Acre |
| 1992 | 88 | 22 | 47 | 565 | 2,500 | 2,160 |
| 1993 | 40 | 15 | 38 | 495 | 1,750 | 2,130 |
| 1994 | 85 | 27 | 50 | 846 | 2,900 | 2,300 |
| 1995 | 91 | 24 | 32 | 528 | 2,800 | 2,100 |
| 1996 | 79 | 25 | 45 | 774 | 3,100 | 2,310 |
| 1997 | 95 | 22.5 | 50 | 688 | 2,900 | 2,340 |
| 1998 | 40 | 21 | 32 | 587 | 2,450 | 2,050 |
| 1999 | 70 | 20 | 43 | 428 | 2,300 | 2,000 |
| 2000 | 65 | 25 | 49 | 627 | 2,950 | 2,390 |
| 2001 | 108 | 22 | 43 | 686 | 3,000 | 2,450 |
| 2002 (Estimated)2/ | 42 | 18 | 44 | 504 | 2,600 | 2,000 |
| 10-Year Average | 76 | 22 | 43 | 622 | 2,665 | 2,223 |
Source: USDA: NASS. State-Level Yield and Production Data.
1/ Yield does not reflect the reduced quality
associated with drought conditions.
2/ National Agricultural Statistics Service.
USDA. Crop Production. CR PR 2-2. August 12, 2002.
Similarly, cotton, peanut and tobacco yields were below their 10-year average yield in 1998, 1999 and 2002 (Table 1). The average 2002 cotton yield of 504 lbs./acre will be the third lowest yield since 1992 (Table 1). On a percentage basis, peanut yields were 92, 86, and 98% of the 10-year average yield in 1998, 1999, and 2002, respectively (Table 2). Tobacco yields were 92%, 90%, and 90% of the 10-year average yield in 1998, 1999, and 2002 (Table 2). Soybean yields have been 94%, 89%, and 81% of the 10-year average year for 1998, 1999, and 2002, respectively (Table 2). Wheat is a cool season crop and is harvested in late spring and early summer. Thus the effect of the drought on wheat has been minimal. Wheat yields have been at the 10-year average level, or above from 1999-2002 (Table 2).
Table 2. Percentage of 10-Year State Average Yields for Major Agronomic Crops 1992-2002.
| Year | Corn | Soybeans | Wheat | Cotton | Peanuts | Tobacco |
| 1992 | 116% | 98% | 110% | 91% | 94% | 97% |
| 1993 | 53% | 67% | 89% | 80% | 66% | 96% |
| 1994 | 112% | 121% | 117% | 136% | 109% | 103% |
| 1995 | 120% | 107% | 75% | 85% | 105% | 94% |
| 1996 | 104% | 112% | 105% | 124% | 116% | 104% |
| 1997 | 125% | 101% | 117% | 111% | 109% | 105% |
| 1998 | 53% | 94% | 75% | 94% | 92% | 92% |
| 1999 | 92% | 89% | 100% | 69% | 86% | 90% |
| 2000 | 85% | 112% | 114% | 101% | 111% | 108% |
| 2001 | 142% | 98% | 100% | 110% | 113% | 110% |
| 2002 | 55% | 81% | 103% | 81% | 98% | 90% |
Marketing-Year Average Prices
Cash market prices at harvest were estimated using historical South Carolina cash market basis information (Table 3). The expected harvest cash price is the futures market price plus the cash market basis at harvest. The expected harvest time loan deficiency payment (LDP) is estimated using historical South Carolina posted county price basis data (Table 3). Cotton is the only commodity expected to trigger a 2002 harvest time LDP of $0.1709 per pound (Table 3) at this writing.
Table 3. Basis and Price Parameters Used in Estimating Harvest Cash Price and Harvest LDP's.
| Cash Market Basis | Posted County Price Basis | Futures Market Price 1/ | Expected Harvest Cash Price | Expected Harvest LDP 2/ | |
| Corn | $0.00 | $-0.17 | $2.66 | $2.66 | $0.00 |
| Soybeans | $-0.40 | $-0.31 | $5.52 | $5.12 | $0.00 |
| Wheat | $-0.30 | $-0.43 | $2.90 | $2.60 | $0.00 |
| Cotton | $-0.035 | $-0.08 | $0.4426 | $0.4076 | $0.1709 |
| Peanuts | Na | Na | Na | $0.1775 | Unknown3/ |
1/ Futures Market Price on 8-19-2002.
2/ LDP calculated using loan rates of $2.18
for corn, $5.03 for soybeans, $2.45 for wheat, and $0.5335 for cotton.
3/ LDP calculation parameters have not been
released for peanuts at this writing.
Besides experiencing lower than average yields, South Carolina producers have also received below average prices for most of the 1998-2002 period (Table 4 and Table 5). Corn prices have been 81%-92% of the 10-year average from 1998-2001. However, the 2002 harvest price is expected to be slightly above the 10-year average (Table 5). Soybean prices have been 74%-90% of the 10-year average from 1998-2002, while wheat prices have been 77%-87% of the 10-year average from 1998-2002. Cotton prices have declined significantly from 1995 and 1996.
The expected harvest peanut price is the loan rate for peanuts. The peanut price is significantly lower in 2002, which reflects a policy change from a quota system to a cash market price. Potential peanut LDP data are not available because calculation parameters have not been released for peanuts at this time. Similarly, tobacco is a program crop and the price has been influenced by production contracts over the past two years.
Table 4. South Carolina Marketing-Year Average Prices for Major Agronomic
Crops,
1992-2002.
| Year | Corn | Soybeans | Wheat | Cotton | Peanuts1/ | Tobacco 2/ |
| $/Bushel | $/Bushel | $/Bushel | $/Pound | $/Pound | $/Pound | |
| 1992 | $2.30 | $5.44 | $3.20 | $0.5630 | $0.2900 | $1.6990 |
| 1993 | 2.75 | 6.52 | 2.80 | 0.6070 | 0.2850 | 1.6620 |
| 1994 | 2.40 | 5.47 | 3.00 | 0.7230 | 0.2740 | 1.6900 |
| 1995 | 3.40 | 6.93 | 3.60 | 0.7970 | 0.2980 | 1.7790 |
| 1996 | 3.55 | 7.40 | 4.35 | 0.7380 | 0.2450 | 1.8220 |
| 1997 | 2.79 | 6.55 | 3.20 | 0.7010 | 0.2870 | 1.7350 |
| 1998 | 2.40 | 5.00 | 2.60 | 0.6590 | 0.2760 | 1.7110 |
| 1999 | 2.29 | 4.70 | 2.30 | 0.4550 | 0.2670 | 1.6910 |
| 2000 | 2.10 | 4.50 | 2.40 | 0.5500 | 0.2540 | 1.7660 |
| 2001 | 2.10 | 4.20 | 2.30 | 0.4100 | 0.2570 | 1.8410 |
| 2002 3/ | 2.66 | 5.12 | 2.60 | 0.4076 | 0.1775 | 1.7600 |
| 10-Year Average | $2.61 | $5.67 | $2.98 | $0.62 | $0.27 | $1.74 |
Source: NASS. USDA. State-Level Prices.
1/ The 2002 Farm Bill eliminates the peanut quota
system. The 2002 expected price is the marketing loan rate established in
the 2002 Farm Bill.
2/ Tobacco Price is based on quota price.
3/ Estimated using information in Table
3.
Table 5. Percentage of 10-Year Marketing Year Average Price for Major
Agronomic Crops,
1992-2002.
| Year | Corn | Soybeans | Wheat | Cotton | Peanuts 1/ | Tobacco 2/ |
| 1992 | 88% | 96% | 108% | 91% | 106% | 98% |
| 1993 | 105% | 115% | 94% | 98% | 104% | 96% |
| 1994 | 92% | 96% | 101% | 117% | 100% | 97% |
| 1995 | 130% | 122% | 121% | 128% | 109% | 102% |
| 1996 | 136% | 130% | 146% | 119% | 90% | 105% |
| 1997 | 107% | 115% | 108% | 113% | 105% | 100% |
| 1998 | 92% | 88% | 87% | 106% | 101% | 98% |
| 1999 | 88% | 83% | 77% | 73% | 98% | 97% |
| 2000 | 81% | 79% | 81% | 89% | 93% | 102% |
| 2001 | 81% | 74% | 77% | 66% | 94% | 106% |
| 2002 | 102% | 90% | 87% | 66% | 65% | 101% |
1/ The 2002 Farm Bill eliminates the peanut quota
system. The 2002 expected price is the marketing loan rate established in
the 2002 Farm Bill.
2. / Tobacco Price is based on quota price.
Value of Agricultural Production
Table 6 and Table 7 illustrate the combined effect of below average yields and below average prices on the value of agricultural production for the major agronomic crops. The production value for corn has been below the 10-year average from 1998-2002 (Table 6 and Table 7). Similarly, the value of agricultural production for soybeans, peanuts and tobacco has been below the 10-year average each year from 1998-2002. The value of cotton production has been declining steadily since 1998, with an increase in value in 2000.
The projections for 2002 indicates the value of South Carolina agricultural production will be depressed for corn, soybeans, cotton, and peanuts. Wheat is the exception, with average yields and above average prices for 2002.
Table 6. Value of Production for the Major Agronomic Crops produced in
South Carolina,
1992-2002.
| Year | Corn | Soybeans | Wheat | Cotton | Peanuts | Tobacco |
| ($1,000) |
| 1992 | $70,840 | $80,186 | $41,360 | $61,074 | $9,425 | $190,832 |
| 1993 | 26,400 | 50,856 | 27,664 | 59,492 | 6,983 | 184,083 |
| 1994 | 70,380 | 85,660 | 54,000 | 136,400 | 9,933 | 182,689 |
| 1995 | 81,991 | 88,150 | 32,256 | 143,919 | 9,178 | 186,795 |
| 1996 | 106,571 | 99,900 | 52,853 | 161,082 | 7,975 | 214,650 |
| 1997 | 86,141 | 84,004 | 48,000 | 137,934 | 8,739 | 219,235 |
| 1998 | 26,400 | 52,500 | 19,968 | 110,634 | 7,776 | 157,840 |
| 1999 | 44,083 | 42,300 | 21,758 | 61,343 | 6,755 | 131,898 |
| 2000 | 38,220 | 48,375 | 22,932 | 100,007 | 7,493 | 143,505 |
| 2001 | 54,432 | 39,732 | 20,769 | 83,253 | 7,864 | 144,334 |
| 2002 1/ | 32,399 | 39,629 | 54,912 | 60,602 | 4,846 | 109,120 |
| 10-Year Average | $60,546 | $67,166 | $34,156 | $105,514 | $8,212 | $175,586 |
Source: NASS. USDA. State Prices.
1/ Estimated.
Table 7. Percentage of 10-Year Average Value of Production for Major Agronomic Crops Produced in South Carolina, 1992-2002.
| Year | Corn | Soybeans | Wheat | Cotton | Peanuts | Tobacco |
| 1992 | 117% | 119% | 121% | 58% | 115% | 109% |
| 1993 | 44% | 76% | 81% | 56% | 85% | 105% |
| 1994 | 116% | 128% | 158% | 129% | 121% | 104% |
| 1995 | 135% | 131% | 94% | 136% | 112% | 106% |
| 1996 | 176% | 149% | 155% | 153% | 97% | 122% |
| 1997 | 142% | 125% | 141% | 131% | 106% | 125% |
| 1998 | 44% | 78% | 58% | 105% | 95% | 90% |
| 1999 | 73% | 63% | 64% | 58% | 82% | 75% |
| 2000 | 63% | 72% | 67% | 95% | 91% | 82% |
| 2001 | 90% | 59% | 61% | 79% | 96% | 82% |
| 2002 | 54% | 59% | 161% | 57% | 59% | 62% |
Preliminary Estimate of the Economic Loss Due to the 2002 Drought
The economic cost of the 2002 drought is estimated as the per acre yield loss, from the 10-year average yield, multiplied by the expected harvested acres and expected harvest time price. The value of lost LDP is the per unit LDP multiplied by the per acre yield loss and the expected harvested acres. Preliminary analysis suggests that the value of reduced agricultural production, including lost LDP, of the primary agronomic crops is $68.38 million (Table 8). About 30% of the loss is from cotton, 38% is from reduced corn production, and about 18% is from reduced tobacco production.
Table 8. Value of Reduced Production due to the 2002 Drought in South Carolina.
| Value of Reduced Production ($ Million) 1/ |
Value of Lost LDP 1/ ($ Million) |
Total ($ Million) |
|
| Corn | $26.3 | - | $26.30 |
| Soybeans | 9.58 | - | 9.58 |
| Cotton | 14.24 | 5.97 | 20.21 |
| Peanuts | 0.12 | - | 0.12 |
| Tobacco | 12.17 | - | 12.17 |
| Total | $62.41 | $5.97 | $68.38 |
1/ Production loss relative to 10-year average yield.
This is a preliminary estimate, as the harvested yield and abandoned acreage data will be updated in future USDA reports. This cost estimate does not include abandoned acreage, which will be enumerated in future USDA reports. Nor have livestock losses been accounted for in this analysis. Future analysis will include hay and forages, fruit and vegetables, and forestry. This report will be updated as more current information is received.
The drought is causing a major financial crisis for South Carolina producers. A conservative estimate of losses due to drought to South Carolina crop farmers is in excess of $0.5 billion.
![]()
Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service offers its programs to people of all ages, regardless of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital or family status and is an equal opportunity employer.
Clemson University Cooperating with U.S. Department of Agriculture, South Carolina Carolina Counties, Extension Service, Clemson, South Carolina. Issued in Furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Home Economics, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914.
Management
Marketing Memo Index
Ag Econ Home